Month: August 2012

The car’s first set of tires

If you’ve followed along in my Comparative Vehicle Dynamics series, and you didn’t already know, you’ll no doubt come to the conclusion, that tires are an extremely important, if not the most important, part of a race car.

My 2006 run in the STS class was fueled largely in part by the availability of (for the time) next-generation tires for my 17″ wheel, 25″ diameter tire’d 240sx, vs. their 15″ wheel, 23″ diameter Civics.  I’d had the chance to experience one of these tires (Yokohama Advan Neova AD07) the year before on an IS300, and knew they held a real edge over the Falken RT-215 still popular on STS Civics.  I found I was even faster on the Bridgestone Potenza RE-01R released in 2006, even if I didn’t like the feel of the tire as much, as the Yokohama.

The point of all this, was the 240sx was a fun, but rather expensive experiment, where the hypothesis went something like “A car that has no business doing well, can not only be competitive, but possibly win in Solo, due to a small tire advantage”.  I think this hypothesis was proved correct even if it wasn’t the fastest both days – besides, the 240Ssx ran away with the ProSolo win, as it was able to take advantage of its other strengths – namely RWD and torque.

So, tires matter a lot, and if there’s one place you can give yourself a meaningful advantage, it’s there.  Chasing every last HP and ounce of weight are also useful pursuits, but in almost any case, I’d give those up to get a tire edge.

But unfortunately, there are only so many tires out there.  The leading edge street tires are focused enough in their development, the odds of finding a ringer, that through some weird trick, happens to outperform 2012’s usual suspects (Toyo R1R, Yok AD08, Bridgestone RE-11, Dunlop Star Spec, Hankook RS3, Kumho XS, and now the Michelin PSS) is pretty much nonexistent.  Plus the STAC wisely toughened the entry requirements for ST tires, mandating they be available in the same diameter/size counts as Stock-legal tires, which eliminated possible ringers like the Nissan GTR and Ford GT500 OEM tires.

As of this writing I don’t really have a good sense for where I’ll be going with the race tires for this car.  Looks like there’s more coming out in the off season, so 2013 stands to be a lot different than the past couple years, in the tire makeup in grid.

It does look like I’ll need to run 18″ wheels though.  I for sure want to run the class-max width size (265) and most manufacturers only offer that width in 18″ diameter.  While this size defies the vintage look of the car, it does allow for a lot of additional backspacing in the front, making it easier to fit the tires.  With 15″ wheels, I appear to only have about 4.25″ of backspace room, before the wheel would hit the steering arm.  With 18″ wheels, I’m aiming for more like 5.25″ of backspace.

I do have some 18″ wheels on the way.  They’ve been a work in progress the last several weeks, at a small race wheel shop here in California.  If I’d gone with CCW I’d probably have received my wheels weeks ago, as Purner is so solid on turn-around times, but even though I’m going 18″ for race wheels, I wanted to go with a style that at least tried to look vintage.  Purner’s stuff, even the “classic”, all felt a bit too modern for the car.  Hopefully the style I’ve picked for this first set looks good, the wheel maker is so low volume, there are very few of his wheels out in the wild.

In all this research of tire and wheel makers, and looking at the universe of first-gen Camaros out there, I decided I pretty much hate every large diameter (>16″) wheel that’s been put on these cars.  Some look less awful than others, but the styles are all so modern, they just seem to contradict the rest of the car.  And it’s not just the wheels, the tire sidewall is a big part of it too.  A modern 265/35-18 tire is about 25.5″ tall, with a sidewall height of only 3.6″.  A vintage 7.00-15 Goodyear Blue Streak, is 26.7″ in diameter, with a sidewall almost 6″ tall.

If I’m working to make the car competitive in SCCA autocross, I’m going to run the best tire for the car I can, which means running the correct diameter wheels, which means probably not running on the car in autocross, what I think looks best, or suits the car best.  Lots of work has gone into making the car look the way I want, and I was careful to allow backwards-compatibility with vintage-sized 15″ wheels.  My interest in pursuing a vintage set of wheels and tires was piqued recently, when I came across a thread discussing vintage racing tires for Cobras.

In it, many people spoke highly of a certain model Avon tire – the CR6ZZ.  Available in tall sidewall sizes, but built with modern techniques and knowledge.  Great on the track once warmed up, great in the wet, and fun on the street, with many people getting over 10,000 street miles in their hot rods.  Only downside is cost – one set of 245/60-15 (front) and 275/55-15’s (rear) cost more than the last set of 335/30-18 and 345/30-19 Hoosier A6’s I bought for the Viper.

I figure these will last a lot longer than those A6’s – the Camaro isn’t likely to get many street miles, so these things are likely to die of old age before being worn out.  Of course they supposedly they make great track tires, so they may see some use in that capacity as well.  Ironically, since they are Treadwear 80 tires, I won’t be able to run them STX, even if I hadn’t gone with the wide 275 rear tire.

The wheels for these tires are a very special set, made by an even smaller wheel company than the one doing my 18″ wheels.  This latter company, makes a lot of the wheels used by real vintage racers, the guys running the original Trans-Am and Can-Am cars at events like the Monterey Historics.  Even when narrowing my search of wheels to original style and size 15″ Minilites and Torq-Thrust wheels, nothing available new today from the regular makers seemed to look right, except these guys.  They just so happened to have four in their inventory, normally I’d have to wait 6-8 months to get a set, but instead I should have them soon.

Hope to get the car on the ground soon, on this vintage style wheel/tire setup.  I’ve had the car sitting with jackstands under the suspension to try to get things to settle a bit, but the rear is still about 3″ too high, and there’s not much weight left to put in that’ll drop it, save for fuel.


Got a collection of various fluids together for the car.  These sorts of things you usually change out one at a time, but since every system is starting out dry, needed them all.

Z28 Camaro fluids

Conventional wisdom has it, you don’t use synthetic fluids in these old cars, and pretty much everything here is synthetic.  Hopefully since the seals in everything are new, they won’t have “grown accustomed” to dino juice, and develop leaks, which is one of the main reasons given not to switch.

I won’t need all of the above in the first fill, wanted to get plenty to handle any spillage, and leave some leftover for the first fluid change.

Here’s a description of the Camaro’s new juices, from left to right-

Power Steering Fluid

Went synthetic with the power steering fluid, because there is a real possibility, the system won’t be able to cope with autocross.  The later cars (3rd & 4th Gen, even C4 Corvettes) have trouble with boiled PS fluid in autocross settings.  I’m not allowed to run a cooler, or make any other mods to help the PS system out directly.  The PS lines run very close to the headers (which have been coated with the best stuff out there) but that’s another source of heat.  The Redline synthetic stuff is supposed to be able to handle much higher temps than regular fluids, and better resist foaming and other breakdowns.

Manual Transmission Fluid

Here, some people say to never go synthetic.  Big reason besides leaks, is how it doesn’t work with the synchros.  Transmission synchronizers need some amount of friction to generate their speeds, and if the fluid is too slippery, they won’t work right, and cause crunchy shifts and increased wear.  Also, some of the elements present in modern GL-5 fluids, can be harmful to the metals in the synchros, mainly brass.  The Redline 75W90NS is formulated to be a good manual transmission fluid – it lacks the friction modifying agent present in traditional limited-slip gear oils, helping synchros work, and it doesn’t contain the elements so harmful to the synchro metals.

Differential Fluid

This isn’t so bad a place to go synthetic.  If I was really worried about the limited slip not working well (as I was in the Viper) I’d run a “NS” fluid here, but I suspect the diff will work fine, and the 80W140 fluid has the friction modifying (reducing) elements to hopefully keep it from being a push monster in sweepers.  Redline makes some beefier stuff like the Shockproof, but I don’t think I’ll really be hitting the diff that hard with these street tires and a suspension setup almost the opposite of what you’d do in a drag car.

Brake Fluid

ATE Super Blue is a fluid I was very fond of back in my S2000 track days.  It held up well to the abuse of the track in a car that was a little bit under-braked from the factory.  For whatever reason, the best brake pedal firmness I ever had in that car, was with the Super Blue.  I would say brake feel too, but the S2000’s brake feel was never very good.  It was also a color (blue) unlike any other, making it easy to tell when it had fully made it in, and later back out, of the braking system.  They used to sell a golden color fluid to use in alternating flushes, but the basic parts-store stuff (Valvoline Synpower was one of the best) was usually clear-ish, a good enough contrast.

Engine Oil

LAT probably isn’t a name most people recognize.  It’s the acronym for LubeATech Racing Oils – a small but growing company supplying high-end racing oils.  This brand was recommended by my engine builder, and since it’d been so long since I talked to him, really had to wrack my brain trying to remember the name he’d given me. With the caveat there’s a lot of legend out there in the engine building crowd, the story I got, was that Mobil1 used to be decent, but that Mobil had started cheeping out on their synthetic base stocks and additives, and that this engine builder’s customers were seeing rapidly increased wear under racing conditions.  He’d been moving them to LAT for a while, and had  a couple good stories of how the oil had saved a few butts from expensive catastrophes.  This oil isn’t cheap, but as you might imagine, neither is building a stock-legal ’67 302, and I want to do everything I can to protect it.  These engines simply don’t have the oil control by themselves to live under racing-type conditions.

Water Wetter

Most racers know about Water Wetter – it has some chemical trickery to reduce surface tension and improve the water’s ability to cool the car.  I plan to run straight distilled water + Water Wetter in the car, since it won’t ever get anywhere cold enough to freeze, and this will help keep things coolest.  Plus if anything bad ever happens and there’s a leak, it isn’t slippery like coolant (which can be worse than oil!), so it help minimize cleanup.  I don’t anticipate general cooling problems in autocross, but it’s hard to say now.


There’s a couple missing – one is the grease that goes into wheel bearings, U-joints, ball joints, and other places.  Have a good synthetic grease in the gun for that.  The other is the fluid the car needs the most of – gas!  Fortunately there’s a station just a few miles from me that carries street legal 100 octane, which this thing will need.  On the dyno it was tuned running a ~100 octane mix of 91 and ~110 low lead fuel.  Not sure if you can get leaded gas legal for the street at the pumps any more these days.  Since it is carbureted and cat-free, I possibly have some fuel options my competitors don’t.

First driving destination with the car will likely be to that local gas station.  Still a ways away from making that trip, but the day is coming closer!

Harmonic balancer, crank pulley, and an ounce of unobtanium

Harmonic Balancer

Motor was dyno tested to 7k RPM with a Fluidampr harmonic balancer.  Fluidampr has a pretty good reputation, but the unit used on my motor was mostly just what they had lying around in the shop, vs. an ideal.   From the looks of it, it had done a few rotations.  Including, perhaps, a few on the shop floor-

After a typically lengthy amount of research, ended up with a solution, an ATI Super Damper.

ATI Super Damper for Z28 302

Now, it’s not like there’s one ATI Super Damper for a small-block Chevy.  A search on Summit for a ’67 Camaro returns 34 unique part numbers.  Why so many?

There are several choices you have for fitment.  Starting with the hub, the piece that slides onto the end of the crank – you can go with steel or aluminum.

Steel is a bit heavier, but a lot easier to make work.  Because the damper relies on a tight fit to the crank, and the different coefficients of thermal expansion, the aluminum hubs essentially have to be custom-bored to fit most cranks.  They also require more frequent inspection and replacement, and I’d come across at least a couple online stories of catastrophic failure.  Ugg.  Not something I’d be looking forward to.  And while it would be lighter than the steel, most of that weight is at a very small radius from the crank centerline, so the impact on MOI (moment of inertia, the object’s resistance to being spun), would be the smallest of these parts.

Part 1 – Hub: Steel or aluminum (steel)

Next is the piece pictured above, the damper element itself.  Internally these are comprised of two or three damper rings, separated by a tuned and serviceable elastomer.  The three ring dampers are more costly and a bit more heavy, but offer superior damping characteristics.  I chose three because the weight difference was negligible, and this was hedging somewhat the next choice made…

Part 2 – Rings: 2 or 3 (3)

The dampers are offered in varying diameters, essentially 5″, 6″ or 7″.  The stock Z28 damper, which was a popular unit on all racing Chevy motors for a long time, is actually a big heavy 8″ piece.  Again, as with ring choice, the greater the radius of the damping elements, the more they can do to handle those crank harmonics.  I made a compromise choice with 6″.  If the car was only ever autocrossed I might do 5″, but I do plan to do the occasional track day too, where it will spend a bit more time at high RPM.  The 7″ unit would have been OK too but they don’t seem to be stocked anywhere, and I wouldn’t want to wait to have one made.

Part 3 – Diameter: 5″, 6″, 7″ (6″)

Lastly, the metal used out between the elastomers, can be steel or aluminum.  The steel options are significantly heavier than aluminum (8lbs. vs. 3lbs. typical), and reportedly don’t offer much in the way of improved damping characteristics – mostly just less cost.  Went with aluminum here.

Part 4 – Damper material: Steel or aluminum (aluminum)

The above 2x2x3x2 only equates to 24 options – there are others for supercharged motors, weird offset items, things like that.  A truly staggering array!

Now, some may recall a book by David Vizard, where he mentions testing a bunch of different dampers, and the heaviest one made the most HP.  So why didn’t I get the heaviest one?  My thinking here is the ATI should do a very good job for its weight, and this unit is at least 5 pounds lighter than the heavier option – so even if the car is down a HP or two, that’s 5 fewer pounds the front tires will have to try to drag around every autocross corner.  Everything is a compromise…


Crank Pulley

In a previous post I showed the weight savings from a billet aluminum alternator pulley, over a stock cad-plated piece – it was significant.  I’m hoping the weight savings from a similar billet aluminum crank pulley are similar.  This crank pulley is from the same “performance ratio” (somewhat underdrive) March kit.  They are very nice looking pieces, with a shiny anodize that’s easy to clean-

March Performance crank pulley for 302 SBC Z28

Not sure exactly how underdriven this pulley set is.  A plus side of the underdriving, in addition to “freeing up” some HP, is it tends to help keep the water and power steering pumps from cavitating at high RPM.  Even though the 302 motors could spin fast, the ancillaries weren’t always built to handle it well.

Since the fan is driven off the water pump pulley, the fan will turn more slowly, which frees up HP (mechanical fan can sap 40HP at high rpm!) but has the downside, of maybe not turning the fan as quickly at idle.  That could mean higher temps – not usually a big deal in autocross – but it could also mean problems for the battery, if the charging system isn’t able to keep up.  Actually have my pimpy battery for the car, that’ll be another post, once I decide where it’s going…

March power steering pulley Z28 Camaro

Above is a shot at the March power steering pulley in place. Apparently the stock PS pulley is a big heavy cast iron piece, yikes! This pulley should do a lot to mitigate the 20+ lbs. a power steering system adds to the car. The pump itself isn’t that heavy, nor are the lines or brackets. I bet half the weight is in the heavier steering box, and at least that piece is behind the front wheels.  Can you tell yet I’m obsessed with weight distribution? 🙂

Here’s the crank pulley mated to the new damper and hub, as it will be in the car:

ATI Super Damper and March performance crank pulley assembled



So what holds those things together?  A few fasteners.  One is the main crank pulley bolt, threaded into the crank itself, operating at a very small radius.

Additionally, there are three threaded fasteners, 3/8″-16 x 1.25″.  Pretty small and light units, but they’re connected right to the crank, operating at a couple inch radius, contributing a good bit to the engine’s MOI.  Given that we’re free to replace the crank pulley, means we’re also free to choose what fasteners to use in holding in the replacement.

We’ve all heard stories of people with big $ going through their cars, chopping down every heavy steel bolt to minimum length, and replacing every other bolt/nut they can with something much lighter, to great effect.  I was curious how much benefit there would be on these units, as being small, they wouldn’t be too expensive, and since they rotate at crankshaft speed out ahead of the front wheels, would be just about the best weight to replace…

The three steel bolts shipped with the ATI damper don’t feel heavy for their size, and weigh in at 2.3oz for the trio-

ATI super damper bolts

Now on to the unobtainium (using that word in the Lockheed Martin SR-71 Skunkworks sense) bolts.  Equivalent in size to the ATI supplied bolts, they are…

Titanium mettec fasteners used on crank pulley for 302 Z28 Camaro

…1.05oz lighter!  Over 45% reduction in weight, not too bad.  If one were to go through the whole car and replace every fastener with one of this material, in a just-long-enough length, bet you could save over 50% of existing fastener weight.  On a car like this that’d be not insignificant – possibly 20 pounds.

Still, I won’t be running out to replace a whole bunch more fasteners, though with all the allowances in the class, there are quite a few which could be.  Just wanted a little unobtainium in the car to give it a bit more of that cachet, and to see for myself what sort of real savings it could bring.

Mettec fasteners for Camaro Z28 crank pulley

When you guys see how heavy my exhaust system is, those three little bolts will seem really silly. 🙂

Headers back, couple minor things

Headers made it back from Swaintech with their White Lightning coating. 

302 Camaro Z28 headers with Swain Tech White Lightning coating

Again a very high quality result, and now that I see how close the headers run to critical components like the starter and power steering, am even more glad I went with it.

The coating itself should last a long long time, and help the neighboring components last longer too.

headers installed, 302 Z28 Camaro engine bay

Thought I’d let the pimpy valve covers make their entry now.  They’re the same off-white used everywhere else on the car, though they do look a little different here in the light.

Still have a few little things to take care of on the underside of the car before the exhaust can go in, not the least of which is the remaining bends to make on the shifter linkage so it doesn’t bind itself up when in reverse.

Out back, made a couple modifications to the rear swaybar, even though it hasn’t been used yet.  One, was shortening the endlinks on both sides by about an inch.  The second, was shortening the driver-side arm, so it’s the same length as the non-adjustable passenger side.  These two changes should provide a lot more bump travel – with this arm length, the bar arm ends will contact the floor (if nothing else hits first) at its highest point, allowing for maximum travel.  You can see it somewhat here:

Z28 302 Camaro custom rear swaybar

A couple weeks ago I put together a to-do list of things I could think of off the top of my head.  Presently it has 57 items, of which 7 have been done.  4 will require outside help – mount tires to wheels (which themselves haven’t even been made yet), add a slight bend to front swaybar arms (purchased a narrower front center section for the swaybar to allow for more tire clearance, but it requires modification to the arm shape), welding the alternator bracket to the header (found a bracket but should have it welded for better stability/reliability), and the headliner install.  I could *try* the headliner install myself but everything I’ve seen says you need at least 2 people, if not 3.  It’s not like newer stuff where it snaps in, it’s a real fabric thing with adhesive and these wacky metal rods.  Looks like awful work.

Each of the tasks on the list are 4-8 hours, so still a long way to go.  Will try to take more pictures along the way.   Here’s an artsy one in the meantime…