{"id":1295,"date":"2012-07-22T15:52:10","date_gmt":"2012-07-22T22:52:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rhoadescamaro.com\/build\/?p=1295"},"modified":"2012-07-23T13:23:52","modified_gmt":"2012-07-23T20:23:52","slug":"intake-irony","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.rhoadescamaro.com\/build\/?p=1295","title":{"rendered":"Intake Irony"},"content":{"rendered":"

Received an email last week from Vorshlag<\/a> race shop owner Terry Fair, about a possible problem with the Camaro.\u00a0 I do love getting these sorts of mails, seriously!\u00a0 One has already helped me spot a problem that\u00a0may need fixing (offset\u00a0axis of my front lower control arm\u00a0bushings).\u00a0 This one began with-<\/p>\n

A friend of ours who is a 1967-1969 Z28 expert (Ed, cc’d here). We showed him your build thread, which he loved, but he noted one glaring missing item underhood within 15 seconds…<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It then pointed to this photo:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

and continued-<\/p>\n

He saw this picture and said “Its missing the hole in the firewall for the cowl feed air cleaner inlet”. Apparently this is only on the 1967 Z28s. I had never heard of this but we did a google search on “1967 Z28 cowl” images, and sure enough…<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Then followed some photos, which I’ll include here:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The\u00a0second one is from a Car Craft article –\u00a0\u00a0Car Craft photo source<\/a>\u00a0– check it out there to help with their ad revenue!<\/p>\n

\u00a0He said these were cut at the factory with an air chisel<\/em>, but that is accurate. You can see the edge of the hole in the first link above with the dual-quad air cleaner removed. Of course you don’t need to run this exact air cleaner (and you can’t find one for any amount of money), but that hole probably needs to be there. Somebody will notice that missing.<\/p>\n

You might already know about this, just wanted to pass that along. Keep up the good work – love this blog!!! \ud83d\ude42<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

###<\/p>\n

The cowl air cleaner is an entertaining bit of original Z28 lore.\u00a0 Ed contends the firewall holes for the air cleaner were cut (coursely, it would seem) at the factory on all ’67 Z28s.\u00a0 Terry extends this to say, that I need to have the hole, since it would have been part of every ’67 Z28 chassis, even if I don’t intend to use it.<\/p>\n

The irony here, is I would love <\/strong><\/em>to cut that hole and run my intake like that, but I can’t, because it wouldn’t be legal!\u00a0 \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n

The truth is, that intake option was available from the factory, but it was delivered as\u00a0one of the earliest examples of what the SCCA\u00a0calls\u00a0(rather appropriately in this case)\u00a0a “trunk kit”.\u00a0 Trunk kits are defined\u00a0in the SCCA rulebook as “post-factory performance kits”.\u00a0 Frankly the lines on what is and isn’t\u00a0a trunk kit is a bit confusing to me,\u00a0as some recent cars (Mazda MX-5 MSR and Pontiac Solstice Z0K) have been deemed legal with some trunk-kit type suspension stuff.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Not a huge deal here, as I can probably find another way to\u00a0accomplish a good cold air intake.\u00a0 Still, for as unsophisticated as many parts of this car were, the orignal 1967 cold air\u00a0intake design is actually\u00a0very good – pulling cold air from a high pressure area at the base of the windshield, without a lot of complex routing.\u00a0\u00a0Also alleviates the need for\u00a0a big ugly scoop on the hood – not a fan of those for their looks from the outside, and for what they do to visibility from the inside.<\/p>\n

You could get\u00a0this intake kit as a service part\u00a0from your dealer, or\u00a0as part of RPO package “Z28-2” ($75 more than the regular Z28 option) or in RPO package “Z28-4” (which also included headers, also in the trunk, for $475 more than the base Z28 option).\u00a0 Some of this information is available here in a compiled list of first-generation Camaro options: First generation Camaro options<\/a>\u00a0(itself borrowed from the great group at the “Camaro Research Group” http:\/\/camaros.org\/options.shtml#RPOSpreadsheet<\/a>\u00a0)<\/p>\n

Jerry MacNeish, published author on first-gen Z28 information, goes into further detail in his book “The Definitive 1967-1968 Camaro Z\/28 Fact Book” (available here: http:\/\/www.z28camaro.com\/publications.html<\/a>\u00a0)<\/p>\n

For the Z\/28, the cowl plenum air cleaner was available as a regular production option or as a service part.\u00a0 With an RPO Z282 package, a Z\/28 would come with the cowl plenum air cleaner shipped in the trunk.\u00a0 An RPO Z284 package would provide a Z\/28 with the air cleaner and set of exhaust headers.<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

If factory ordered, the air cleaner was shipped in the trunk with installation instructions that showed where to cut the firewall hole.\u00a0 The method for cutting the hole was left up to the installer.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Jerry even includes a full-page image of “Instruction Sheet Identification No. C916621”, which details the placement and what size holes to drill for the attachment screws.\u00a0 You can be certain Jerry’s book will be riding right alongside my collection of factory manuals, to assist in the event of the car being protested.\u00a0 \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n

Not wanting to trust only a single source of information – and frankly, also out of hope I could find an opposing bit of data to justify running this intake myself, I’ve researched this a ton on my own.\u00a0 Unfortunately everything I’ve found supports Jerry’s stance, it was a factory option but had to be dealer or user installed.\u00a0 I’ve also found good evidence of original ’67 Z28s without the hole present, further contradicting Ed’s belief, that the holes were factory cut.\u00a0 One such place is this excellent Z28 Restoration Chronicle<\/a>\u00a0– featuring this Z28 Restoration Chronicle – firewall pic<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

I’ve gone back to that site countless times to review things like brake line routing, shifter hole placement, etc.\u00a0 It’s extremely good, even though the pictures are a bit lower resolution that I would like, or than we’ve grown accustomed to in 2010+.\u00a0 In the picture above you can see this original ’67 Z28 Camaro firewall, without the cowl plenum air cleaner hole cut.<\/p>\n

So, I can’t run it, but would really like to.\u00a0 The original Trans-Am guys ran it single-carb in ’67 and into ’68, and\u00a0later ran a revised version that fit the dual-carb induction setup Chevrolet homologated.<\/p>\n

An interesting observation in researching alternative cold air intake (CAI) solutions for the car, is how little attention people seem to have paid to this aspect of performance in these cars.\u00a0 My impression was if you asked a hot rodder what “C A I” stood for, providing the hint it had something to do with the intake, they’d probably guess “Chrome<\/em> Air Intake”.\u00a0 You can find 10,000 different chrome air cleaner lids for these cars, but practically nothing built for performance, short of some tall intake stuff designed to work with monster hood scoops.<\/p>\n

One thing I have found is this, made by Spectre Performance<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Installed in a classic Mustang, from an article at MustangsAndFords.com<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

This sort of intake looks a little bit funny on a carbureted car, but should work.\u00a0 They have a kit now for the first-gen Camaro with a little blockoff plate, where the filter goes in the front passenger corner, the original home for the battery.\u00a0 Carburetors are a bit like MAF (Mass Air Flow) sensors, in that they expect the air they ingest to come from certain paths and angles.\u00a0 Not sure how this sort of kit would affect things.<\/p>\n

Another option is from K&N, they make a device they call the “Stub Stack”, a small velocity-horn-esque component which sits above the carburetor:<\/p>\n

\"K&N<\/a><\/p>\n

That sort of device should be legal in ST, since it operates before the carburetor inlet.\u00a0 They also have these XStream air cleaner lids<\/a>, where the top becomes an\u00a0additional filter element:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

But haven’t really been able to find any good third-party test results for any of these things.\u00a0 The old world of small-block-Chevy engine tuning seems lacking in some of the basic A-B scientific part tests we expect to see on modern platforms.\u00a0 They could be junk.<\/p>\n

So, as of today, still not sure what I’ll do for induction.\u00a0 Even with the Swain coating on the headers, it’ll be hot underhood, and I’d like the engine to retain consistent performance when being run hard.\u00a0 The factory trunk kit piece would be perfect from a performance, simplicity, and classic authenticity point of view, but unfortunately I don’t think\u00a0it can be considered\u00a0legal, despite many many hours of research, looking for\u00a0an angle where it arguably could be.<\/p>\n

Many thanks to Terry, Ed, and the Vorshlag crew for their thoughtful message.\u00a0 I’m sure they can appreciate the amusing irony, or being called out for not<\/em> running a part, you wish you could!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Received an email last week from Vorshlag race shop owner Terry Fair, about a possible problem with the Camaro.\u00a0 I do love getting these sorts of mails, seriously!\u00a0 One has already helped me spot a problem that\u00a0may need fixing (offset\u00a0axis of my front lower control arm\u00a0bushings).\u00a0 This one began with- A friend of ours who […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[15],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.rhoadescamaro.com\/build\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1295"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.rhoadescamaro.com\/build\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.rhoadescamaro.com\/build\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.rhoadescamaro.com\/build\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.rhoadescamaro.com\/build\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1295"}],"version-history":[{"count":35,"href":"http:\/\/www.rhoadescamaro.com\/build\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1295\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1339,"href":"http:\/\/www.rhoadescamaro.com\/build\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1295\/revisions\/1339"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.rhoadescamaro.com\/build\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.rhoadescamaro.com\/build\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.rhoadescamaro.com\/build\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}